They report being SCSI-3 but seem to give back rubbish to a
REPORT_LUNS command. Force them to be sequentially scanned.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:24:39AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> We tested 2.5.51 on a ppc64 box, qlogic 2312 and a fastt700 array. I
> had CONFIG_SCSI_REPORT_LUNS and unfortunately it thought the management
> LUN was a disk:
>
> Vendor: IBM Model: Universal Xport Rev: 0520
> Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
>
> ...
>
> SCSI device sdaj: drive cache: write through
> SCSI device sdaj: 40960 512-byte hdwr sectors (21 MB)
> sdaj: unknown partition table
> Attached scsi disk sdaj at scsi2, channel 0, id 0, lun 31
>
> ...
>
> end_request: I/O error, dev sdaj, sector 0
Three years later...
It looks like SGI use the same FC vendor and they already have a
workaround for this issue. The following patch adds the IBM version of
it.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
From: Steve Wilcox <spwilcox@att.com>
In order to properly report LUN's > 7, the DEC HSG80 definition in
scsi_devinfo.c needs to include BLIST_REPORTLUN2 rather than
BLIST_SPARSELUN. I've tested this change with several HSG firmware
revisions and with both Emulex and Qlogic HBA's.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
When run on a kernel that scans all LUNs, a certain crappy
scsi scanner reports the same LUN over and over..
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=155457
Aparently they were so shamed by this, they chose to remain
anonymous. Though it seems the blacklist code handles
anonymous vendors just fine.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
James Bottomley