kernel_samsung_sm7125

jenna

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Herbert Xu	15333038d5	[CRYPTO]: Only reschedule if !in_atomic() The netlink gfp_any() problem made me double-check the uses of in_softirq() in crypto/*. It seems to me that we should be checking in_atomic() instead of in_softirq() in crypto_yield. Otherwise people calling the crypto ops with spin locks held or preemption disabled will get burnt, right? Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>	20 years ago
Linus Torvalds	1da177e4c3	Linux-2.6.12-rc2 Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!	20 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Herbert Xu

15333038d5

[CRYPTO]: Only reschedule if !in_atomic()

The netlink gfp_any() problem made me double-check the uses of in_softirq()
in crypto/*.  It seems to me that we should be checking in_atomic() instead
of in_softirq() in crypto_yield.  Otherwise people calling the crypto ops
with spin locks held or preemption disabled will get burnt, right?

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

20 years ago

Linus Torvalds

1da177e4c3

Linux-2.6.12-rc2

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!

20 years ago

2 Commits (271b74d0b886301f297407dd7ae11b99607f8089)