You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
kernel_samsung_sm7125/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c

564 lines
15 KiB

/*
* Simple MTD partitioning layer
*
* (C) 2000 Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
*
* This code is GPL
*
* $Id: mtdpart.c,v 1.55 2005/11/07 11:14:20 gleixner Exp $
*
* 02-21-2002 Thomas Gleixner <gleixner@autronix.de>
* added support for read_oob, write_oob
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/kmod.h>
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
#include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
#include <linux/mtd/compatmac.h>
/* Our partition linked list */
static LIST_HEAD(mtd_partitions);
/* Our partition node structure */
struct mtd_part {
struct mtd_info mtd;
struct mtd_info *master;
u_int32_t offset;
int index;
struct list_head list;
int registered;
};
/*
* Given a pointer to the MTD object in the mtd_part structure, we can retrieve
* the pointer to that structure with this macro.
*/
#define PART(x) ((struct mtd_part *)(x))
/*
* MTD methods which simply translate the effective address and pass through
* to the _real_ device.
*/
static int part_read (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
int res;
if (from >= mtd->size)
len = 0;
else if (from + len > mtd->size)
len = mtd->size - from;
res = part->master->read (part->master, from + part->offset,
len, retlen, buf);
if (unlikely(res)) {
if (res == -EUCLEAN)
mtd->ecc_stats.corrected++;
if (res == -EBADMSG)
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
}
return res;
}
static int part_point (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, u_char **buf)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
if (from >= mtd->size)
len = 0;
else if (from + len > mtd->size)
len = mtd->size - from;
return part->master->point (part->master, from + part->offset,
len, retlen, buf);
}
static void part_unpoint (struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *addr, loff_t from, size_t len)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
part->master->unpoint (part->master, addr, from + part->offset, len);
}
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
static int part_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
struct mtd_oob_ops *ops)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
int res;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
if (from >= mtd->size)
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
return -EINVAL;
if (ops->datbuf && from + ops->len > mtd->size)
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
return -EINVAL;
res = part->master->read_oob(part->master, from + part->offset, ops);
if (unlikely(res)) {
if (res == -EUCLEAN)
mtd->ecc_stats.corrected++;
if (res == -EBADMSG)
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
}
return res;
}
static int part_read_user_prot_reg (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->read_user_prot_reg (part->master, from,
len, retlen, buf);
}
static int part_get_user_prot_info (struct mtd_info *mtd,
struct otp_info *buf, size_t len)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->get_user_prot_info (part->master, buf, len);
}
static int part_read_fact_prot_reg (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->read_fact_prot_reg (part->master, from,
len, retlen, buf);
}
static int part_get_fact_prot_info (struct mtd_info *mtd,
struct otp_info *buf, size_t len)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->get_fact_prot_info (part->master, buf, len);
}
static int part_write (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, const u_char *buf)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
if (!(mtd->flags & MTD_WRITEABLE))
return -EROFS;
if (to >= mtd->size)
len = 0;
else if (to + len > mtd->size)
len = mtd->size - to;
return part->master->write (part->master, to + part->offset,
len, retlen, buf);
}
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
static int part_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
struct mtd_oob_ops *ops)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
if (!(mtd->flags & MTD_WRITEABLE))
return -EROFS;
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
if (to >= mtd->size)
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
return -EINVAL;
if (ops->datbuf && to + ops->len > mtd->size)
[MTD] Rework the out of band handling completely Hopefully the last iteration on this! The handling of out of band data on NAND was accompanied by tons of fruitless discussions and halfarsed patches to make it work for a particular problem. Sufficiently annoyed by I all those "I know it better" mails and the resonable amount of discarded "it solves my problem" patches, I finally decided to go for the big rework. After removing the _ecc variants of mtd read/write functions the solution to satisfy the various requirements was to refactor the read/write _oob functions in mtd. The major change is that read/write_oob now takes a pointer to an operation descriptor structure "struct mtd_oob_ops".instead of having a function with at least seven arguments. read/write_oob which should probably renamed to a more descriptive name, can do the following tasks: - read/write out of band data - read/write data content and out of band data - read/write raw data content and out of band data (ecc disabled) struct mtd_oob_ops has a mode field, which determines the oob handling mode. Aside of the MTD_OOB_RAW mode, which is intended to be especially for diagnostic purposes and some internal functions e.g. bad block table creation, the other two modes are for mtd clients: MTD_OOB_PLACE puts/gets the given oob data exactly to/from the place which is described by the ooboffs and ooblen fields of the mtd_oob_ops strcuture. It's up to the caller to make sure that the byte positions are not used by the ECC placement algorithms. MTD_OOB_AUTO puts/gets the given oob data automaticaly to/from the places in the out of band area which are described by the oobfree tuples in the ecclayout data structre which is associated to the devicee. The decision whether data plus oob or oob only handling is done depends on the setting of the datbuf member of the data structure. When datbuf == NULL then the internal read/write_oob functions are selected, otherwise the read/write data routines are invoked. Tested on a few platforms with all variants. Please be aware of possible regressions for your particular device / application scenario Disclaimer: Any whining will be ignored from those who just contributed "hot air blurb" and never sat down to tackle the underlying problem of the mess in the NAND driver grown over time and the big chunk of work to fix up the existing users. The problem was not the holiness of the existing MTD interfaces. The problems was the lack of time to go for the big overhaul. It's easy to add more mess to the existing one, but it takes alot of effort to go for a real solution. Improvements and bugfixes are welcome! Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
19 years ago
return -EINVAL;
return part->master->write_oob(part->master, to + part->offset, ops);
}
static int part_write_user_prot_reg (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->write_user_prot_reg (part->master, from,
len, retlen, buf);
}
static int part_lock_user_prot_reg (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->lock_user_prot_reg (part->master, from, len);
}
static int part_writev (struct mtd_info *mtd, const struct kvec *vecs,
unsigned long count, loff_t to, size_t *retlen)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
if (!(mtd->flags & MTD_WRITEABLE))
return -EROFS;
return part->master->writev (part->master, vecs, count,
to + part->offset, retlen);
}
static int part_erase (struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
int ret;
if (!(mtd->flags & MTD_WRITEABLE))
return -EROFS;
if (instr->addr >= mtd->size)
return -EINVAL;
instr->addr += part->offset;
ret = part->master->erase(part->master, instr);
return ret;
}
void mtd_erase_callback(struct erase_info *instr)
{
if (instr->mtd->erase == part_erase) {
struct mtd_part *part = PART(instr->mtd);
if (instr->fail_addr != 0xffffffff)
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
instr->addr -= part->offset;
}
if (instr->callback)
instr->callback(instr);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtd_erase_callback);
static int part_lock (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
if ((len + ofs) > mtd->size)
return -EINVAL;
return part->master->lock(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
}
static int part_unlock (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
if ((len + ofs) > mtd->size)
return -EINVAL;
return part->master->unlock(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
}
static void part_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
part->master->sync(part->master);
}
static int part_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
return part->master->suspend(part->master);
}
static void part_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
part->master->resume(part->master);
}
static int part_block_isbad (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
if (ofs >= mtd->size)
return -EINVAL;
ofs += part->offset;
return part->master->block_isbad(part->master, ofs);
}
static int part_block_markbad (struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
{
struct mtd_part *part = PART(mtd);
int res;
if (!(mtd->flags & MTD_WRITEABLE))
return -EROFS;
if (ofs >= mtd->size)
return -EINVAL;
ofs += part->offset;
res = part->master->block_markbad(part->master, ofs);
if (!res)
mtd->ecc_stats.badblocks++;
return res;
}
/*
* This function unregisters and destroy all slave MTD objects which are
* attached to the given master MTD object.
*/
int del_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master)
{
struct list_head *node;
struct mtd_part *slave;
for (node = mtd_partitions.next;
node != &mtd_partitions;
node = node->next) {
slave = list_entry(node, struct mtd_part, list);
if (slave->master == master) {
struct list_head *prev = node->prev;
__list_del(prev, node->next);
if(slave->registered)
del_mtd_device(&slave->mtd);
kfree(slave);
node = prev;
}
}
return 0;
}
/*
* This function, given a master MTD object and a partition table, creates
* and registers slave MTD objects which are bound to the master according to
* the partition definitions.
* (Q: should we register the master MTD object as well?)
*/
int add_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
const struct mtd_partition *parts,
int nbparts)
{
struct mtd_part *slave;
u_int32_t cur_offset = 0;
int i;
printk (KERN_NOTICE "Creating %d MTD partitions on \"%s\":\n", nbparts, master->name);
for (i = 0; i < nbparts; i++) {
/* allocate the partition structure */
slave = kzalloc (sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!slave) {
printk ("memory allocation error while creating partitions for \"%s\"\n",
master->name);
del_mtd_partitions(master);
return -ENOMEM;
}
list_add(&slave->list, &mtd_partitions);
/* set up the MTD object for this partition */
slave->mtd.type = master->type;
slave->mtd.flags = master->flags & ~parts[i].mask_flags;
slave->mtd.size = parts[i].size;
slave->mtd.writesize = master->writesize;
slave->mtd.oobsize = master->oobsize;
slave->mtd.oobavail = master->oobavail;
slave->mtd.subpage_sft = master->subpage_sft;
slave->mtd.name = parts[i].name;
slave->mtd.bank_size = master->bank_size;
slave->mtd.owner = master->owner;
slave->mtd.read = part_read;
slave->mtd.write = part_write;
if(master->point && master->unpoint){
slave->mtd.point = part_point;
slave->mtd.unpoint = part_unpoint;
}
if (master->read_oob)
slave->mtd.read_oob = part_read_oob;
if (master->write_oob)
slave->mtd.write_oob = part_write_oob;
if(master->read_user_prot_reg)
slave->mtd.read_user_prot_reg = part_read_user_prot_reg;
if(master->read_fact_prot_reg)
slave->mtd.read_fact_prot_reg = part_read_fact_prot_reg;
if(master->write_user_prot_reg)
slave->mtd.write_user_prot_reg = part_write_user_prot_reg;
if(master->lock_user_prot_reg)
slave->mtd.lock_user_prot_reg = part_lock_user_prot_reg;
if(master->get_user_prot_info)
slave->mtd.get_user_prot_info = part_get_user_prot_info;
if(master->get_fact_prot_info)
slave->mtd.get_fact_prot_info = part_get_fact_prot_info;
if (master->sync)
slave->mtd.sync = part_sync;
if (!i && master->suspend && master->resume) {
slave->mtd.suspend = part_suspend;
slave->mtd.resume = part_resume;
}
if (master->writev)
slave->mtd.writev = part_writev;
if (master->lock)
slave->mtd.lock = part_lock;
if (master->unlock)
slave->mtd.unlock = part_unlock;
if (master->block_isbad)
slave->mtd.block_isbad = part_block_isbad;
if (master->block_markbad)
slave->mtd.block_markbad = part_block_markbad;
slave->mtd.erase = part_erase;
slave->master = master;
slave->offset = parts[i].offset;
slave->index = i;
if (slave->offset == MTDPART_OFS_APPEND)
slave->offset = cur_offset;
if (slave->offset == MTDPART_OFS_NXTBLK) {
slave->offset = cur_offset;
if ((cur_offset % master->erasesize) != 0) {
/* Round up to next erasesize */
slave->offset = ((cur_offset / master->erasesize) + 1) * master->erasesize;
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Moving partition %d: "
"0x%08x -> 0x%08x\n", i,
cur_offset, slave->offset);
}
}
if (slave->mtd.size == MTDPART_SIZ_FULL)
slave->mtd.size = master->size - slave->offset;
cur_offset = slave->offset + slave->mtd.size;
printk (KERN_NOTICE "0x%08x-0x%08x : \"%s\"\n", slave->offset,
slave->offset + slave->mtd.size, slave->mtd.name);
/* let's do some sanity checks */
if (slave->offset >= master->size) {
/* let's register it anyway to preserve ordering */
slave->offset = 0;
slave->mtd.size = 0;
printk ("mtd: partition \"%s\" is out of reach -- disabled\n",
parts[i].name);
}
if (slave->offset + slave->mtd.size > master->size) {
slave->mtd.size = master->size - slave->offset;
printk ("mtd: partition \"%s\" extends beyond the end of device \"%s\" -- size truncated to %#x\n",
parts[i].name, master->name, slave->mtd.size);
}
if (master->numeraseregions>1) {
/* Deal with variable erase size stuff */
int i;
struct mtd_erase_region_info *regions = master->eraseregions;
/* Find the first erase regions which is part of this partition. */
for (i=0; i < master->numeraseregions && slave->offset >= regions[i].offset; i++)
;
for (i--; i < master->numeraseregions && slave->offset + slave->mtd.size > regions[i].offset; i++) {
if (slave->mtd.erasesize < regions[i].erasesize) {
slave->mtd.erasesize = regions[i].erasesize;
}
}
} else {
/* Single erase size */
slave->mtd.erasesize = master->erasesize;
}
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
(slave->offset % slave->mtd.erasesize)) {
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
/* FIXME: Let it be writable if it is on a boundary of _minor_ erase size though */
slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
printk ("mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an erase block boundary -- force read-only\n",
parts[i].name);
}
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
(slave->mtd.size % slave->mtd.erasesize)) {
slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
printk ("mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't end on an erase block -- force read-only\n",
parts[i].name);
}
slave->mtd.ecclayout = master->ecclayout;
if (master->block_isbad) {
uint32_t offs = 0;
while(offs < slave->mtd.size) {
if (master->block_isbad(master,
offs + slave->offset))
slave->mtd.ecc_stats.badblocks++;
offs += slave->mtd.erasesize;
}
}
if(parts[i].mtdp)
{ /* store the object pointer (caller may or may not register it */
*parts[i].mtdp = &slave->mtd;
slave->registered = 0;
}
else
{
/* register our partition */
add_mtd_device(&slave->mtd);
slave->registered = 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(add_mtd_partitions);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(del_mtd_partitions);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(part_parser_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(part_parsers);
static struct mtd_part_parser *get_partition_parser(const char *name)
{
struct list_head *this;
void *ret = NULL;
spin_lock(&part_parser_lock);
list_for_each(this, &part_parsers) {
struct mtd_part_parser *p = list_entry(this, struct mtd_part_parser, list);
if (!strcmp(p->name, name) && try_module_get(p->owner)) {
ret = p;
break;
}
}
spin_unlock(&part_parser_lock);
return ret;
}
int register_mtd_parser(struct mtd_part_parser *p)
{
spin_lock(&part_parser_lock);
list_add(&p->list, &part_parsers);
spin_unlock(&part_parser_lock);
return 0;
}
int deregister_mtd_parser(struct mtd_part_parser *p)
{
spin_lock(&part_parser_lock);
list_del(&p->list);
spin_unlock(&part_parser_lock);
return 0;
}
int parse_mtd_partitions(struct mtd_info *master, const char **types,
struct mtd_partition **pparts, unsigned long origin)
{
struct mtd_part_parser *parser;
int ret = 0;
for ( ; ret <= 0 && *types; types++) {
parser = get_partition_parser(*types);
#ifdef CONFIG_KMOD
if (!parser && !request_module("%s", *types))
parser = get_partition_parser(*types);
#endif
if (!parser) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s partition parsing not available\n",
*types);
continue;
}
ret = (*parser->parse_fn)(master, pparts, origin);
if (ret > 0) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "%d %s partitions found on MTD device %s\n",
ret, parser->name, master->name);
}
put_partition_parser(parser);
}
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(parse_mtd_partitions);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_mtd_parser);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(deregister_mtd_parser);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic support for partitioning of MTD devices");