You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
kernel_samsung_sm7125/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h

122 lines
3.9 KiB

davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
16 years ago
/*
* Chip specific defines for DA8XX/OMAP L1XX SoC
*
* Author: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com>
*
* 2007, 2009 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under
* the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. This program
* is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind, whether express
* or implied.
*/
#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX_H
#define __ASM_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX_H
#include <mach/serial.h>
#include <mach/edma.h>
#include <mach/i2c.h>
#include <mach/emac.h>
#include <mach/asp.h>
#include <mach/mmc.h>
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
16 years ago
/*
* The cp_intc interrupt controller for the da8xx isn't in the same
* chunk of physical memory space as the other registers (like it is
* on the davincis) so it needs to be mapped separately. It will be
* mapped early on when the I/O space is mapped and we'll put it just
* before the I/O space in the processor's virtual memory space.
*/
#define DA8XX_CP_INTC_BASE 0xfffee000
#define DA8XX_CP_INTC_SIZE SZ_8K
#define DA8XX_CP_INTC_VIRT (IO_VIRT - DA8XX_CP_INTC_SIZE - SZ_4K)
#define DA8XX_BOOT_CFG_BASE (IO_PHYS + 0x14000)
#define DA8XX_PSC0_BASE 0x01c10000
#define DA8XX_PLL0_BASE 0x01c11000
#define DA8XX_JTAG_ID_REG 0x01c14018
#define DA8XX_TIMER64P0_BASE 0x01c20000
#define DA8XX_TIMER64P1_BASE 0x01c21000
#define DA8XX_GPIO_BASE 0x01e26000
#define DA8XX_PSC1_BASE 0x01e27000
#define DA8XX_LCD_CNTRL_BASE 0x01e13000
#define DA8XX_MMCSD0_BASE 0x01c40000
#define DA8XX_AEMIF_CS2_BASE 0x60000000
#define DA8XX_AEMIF_CS3_BASE 0x62000000
#define DA8XX_AEMIF_CTL_BASE 0x68000000
#define PINMUX0 0x00
#define PINMUX1 0x04
#define PINMUX2 0x08
#define PINMUX3 0x0c
#define PINMUX4 0x10
#define PINMUX5 0x14
#define PINMUX6 0x18
#define PINMUX7 0x1c
#define PINMUX8 0x20
#define PINMUX9 0x24
#define PINMUX10 0x28
#define PINMUX11 0x2c
#define PINMUX12 0x30
#define PINMUX13 0x34
#define PINMUX14 0x38
#define PINMUX15 0x3c
#define PINMUX16 0x40
#define PINMUX17 0x44
#define PINMUX18 0x48
#define PINMUX19 0x4c
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
16 years ago
void __init da830_init(void);
void __init da850_init(void);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
16 years ago
int da8xx_register_edma(void);
int da8xx_register_i2c(int instance, struct davinci_i2c_platform_data *pdata);
int da8xx_register_watchdog(void);
int da8xx_register_emac(void);
int da8xx_register_lcdc(void);
int da8xx_register_mmcsd0(struct davinci_mmc_config *config);
void __init da8xx_init_mcasp(int id, struct snd_platform_data *pdata);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
16 years ago
extern struct platform_device da8xx_serial_device;
extern struct emac_platform_data da8xx_emac_pdata;
extern const short da830_emif25_pins[];
extern const short da830_spi0_pins[];
extern const short da830_spi1_pins[];
extern const short da830_mmc_sd_pins[];
extern const short da830_uart0_pins[];
extern const short da830_uart1_pins[];
extern const short da830_uart2_pins[];
extern const short da830_usb20_pins[];
extern const short da830_usb11_pins[];
extern const short da830_uhpi_pins[];
extern const short da830_cpgmac_pins[];
extern const short da830_emif3c_pins[];
extern const short da830_mcasp0_pins[];
extern const short da830_mcasp1_pins[];
extern const short da830_mcasp2_pins[];
extern const short da830_i2c0_pins[];
extern const short da830_i2c1_pins[];
extern const short da830_lcdcntl_pins[];
extern const short da830_pwm_pins[];
extern const short da830_ecap0_pins[];
extern const short da830_ecap1_pins[];
extern const short da830_ecap2_pins[];
extern const short da830_eqep0_pins[];
extern const short da830_eqep1_pins[];
extern const short da850_uart0_pins[];
extern const short da850_uart1_pins[];
extern const short da850_uart2_pins[];
extern const short da850_i2c0_pins[];
extern const short da850_i2c1_pins[];
extern const short da850_cpgmac_pins[];
extern const short da850_mcasp_pins[];
extern const short da850_lcdcntl_pins[];
extern const short da850_mmcsd0_pins[];
extern const short da850_nand_pins[];
extern const short da850_nor_pins[];
int da8xx_pinmux_setup(const short pins[]);
davinci: da8xx: Add base DA830/OMAP-L137 SoC support The da830/omap l137 is a new SoC from TI that is similar to the davinci line. Since its so similar to davinci, put the support for the da830 in the same directory as the davinci code. There are differences, however. Some of those differences prevent support for davinci and da830 platforms to work in the same kernel binary. Those differences are: 1) Different physical address for RAM. This is relevant to Makefile.boot addresses and PHYS_OFFSET. The Makefile.boot issue isn't truly a kernel issue but it means u-boot won't work with a uImage including both architectures. The PHYS_OFFSET issue is addressed by the "Allow for runtime-determined PHYS_OFFSET" patch by Lennert Buytenhek but it hasn't been accepted yet. 2) Different uart addresses. This is only an issue for the 'addruart' assembly macro when CONFIG_DEBUG_LL is enabled. Since the code in that macro is called so early (e.g., by _error_p in kernel/head.S when the processor lookup fails), we can't determine what platform the kernel is running on at runtime to use the correct uart address. These areas have compile errors intentionally inserted to indicate to the builder they're doing something wrong. A new config variable, CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DMx, is added to distinguish between a true davinci architecture and the da830 architecture. Note that the da830 currently has an issue with writeback data cache so CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH should be enabled when building a da830 kernel. Additional generalizations for future SoCs in the da8xx family done by Sudhakar Rajashekhara and Sekhar Nori. Signed-off-by: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Cherkashin <mcherkashin@ru.mvista.com> Signed-off-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@mvista.com> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj@ti.com> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
16 years ago
#endif /* __ASM_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA8XX_H */